Golden Years, Bold Decisions: Renting vs. Buying for a Fulfilling Retirement

When the decision to downsize or relocate in retirement looms, the question of whether to continue homeownership or opt for renting becomes a central consideration. While owning a home has long been a traditional choice among retirees, the dynamics are changing. In this post, we'll delve into the factors that might sway your decision and explore the advantages of both renting and buying in your golden years.

The Shifting Landscape of Homeownership

For retirees, the allure of homeownership has been remarkably steadfast, even weathering the storm of the 2008 real estate collapse. According to the Census Bureau, homeownership rates among individuals aged 65 and above have consistently hovered around 80 percent. For married couples where at least one spouse is 65 or older, this rate climbs to an impressive 90 percent.

However, among those aged 55 to 64, a different narrative emerges. Ownership rates have dipped from 81 percent in 2006 to 76 percent, reflecting a shift towards renting, either out of necessity or personal preference.

Financial Considerations: Crunching the Numbers

The financial aspect plays a pivotal role in the renting vs. buying debate during retirement. Your budget will significantly influence your choice. Let's take a closer look at the most and least expensive housing markets in the U.S. for both owning and renting:

Owning a Home (Median Home Price): Most Expensive:

  1. San Jose, Calif. - $808,000

  2. San Francisco - $679,800

  3. Honolulu - $672,300

  4. Anaheim, Calif. - $669,800

  5. San Diego - $483,000

Least Expensive:

  1. Youngstown, Ohio - $64,600

  2. Decatur, Ill. - $69,600

  3. Toledo, Ohio - $72,100

  4. Rockford, Ill. - $73,100

  5. Cumberland, Md. - $81,400

Renting (Average for a Two-Bedroom Apartment): Most Expensive:

  1. San Francisco - $4,845

  2. New York - $4,141

  3. Boston - $2,811

  4. Washington, D.C. - $2,684

  5. Jersey City, N.J. - $2,605

Least Expensive:

  1. Fort Wayne, Ind. - $615

  2. Toledo, Ohio - $629

  3. Wichita, Kan. - $652

  4. Detroit - $689

  5. Memphis, Tenn. - $708

Source: National Association of Realtors, Apartmentlist.com

Prioritizing Income in Retirement

In the twilight years, the perspective on homeownership as an investment shifts. While once focused on profiting from property appreciation, retirees now prioritize a comfortable and stable income stream. The question arises: how should you utilize the proceeds from selling your house?

You have options. One route is reinvesting in another property, tying up your funds. Alternatively, you could diversify your investments by placing the proceeds in bank accounts and mutual funds, affording you easy access to your money without resorting to borrowing.

The pivotal step is to scrutinize your retirement budget with and without a home purchase. How will you cover housing expenses? While rents tend to increase (currently around 3 percent), homeownership comes with rising insurance, tax, and upkeep costs. If your finances allow for a home purchase while still maintaining a comfortable lifestyle, buying may be the way to go. Conversely, if the financial strain of homeownership hampers your desired lifestyle, even with a new mortgage, renting might be a more viable choice.

Weighing the Pros and Cons

Broadly speaking, renting tends to be a more economical option on the coasts, where housing costs are exorbitant, whereas buying can be more cost-effective in the central regions of the country. Nicolas Retsinas, a real estate lecturer at Harvard Business School, highlights this trend.

Renting holds other attractions beyond its financial benefits. It serves as a trial run when considering a move to a new area or offers a safety net for relocating near family, should their plans change. Renting also simplifies travel, as you're unburdened by home maintenance during your absence. Additionally, renting can facilitate temporary lifestyle changes, such as living in a vibrant city apartment before finalizing your preferences.

However, for long-time homeowners, the transition to renting might pose challenges. Personalizing the living space becomes limited, and the prospect of a landlord selling the property looms. While there are benefits, it's essential to assess your comfort level and emotional attachment to a rental space.

Embracing Change for a Secure Future

It's crucial to overcome the misconception that renting is "throwing money away." In fact, if renting frees up cash to support your desired lifestyle, it's a pragmatic choice. Rather than accumulating equity for heirs, consider how housing costs can impact your financial freedom during retirement.

As you weigh the scales between renting and buying, remember that circumstances evolve. What suits you now may not be the best fit down the road. Flexibility and adaptability are key. While I'm currently not a renter, I can envision renting as a way to enhance my savings or enable more extensive travel experiences in the future.

Stay tuned as you navigate this pivotal decision on your journey towards a fulfilling retirement. Your choice between renting and buying could set the tone for your golden years of contentment and security.

Kevin Hill

Kevin Hill is a 20 year+ real estate professional with Keller Williams Valley Realty in Woodcliff Lake, NJ who escaped to sunny South Florida for 5 years but “Just when I thought I was out, they pulled me back in!” and moved back to the Garden State. If you have any questions or want to see a topic covered in my blog, contact me at Kevin@escapefromnewjersey.com or 201-214-1349.

https://www.escapefromnewjersey.com
Previous
Previous

Are You Thinking About Buying a Second Home in New Jersey? Here's What You Need to Know

Next
Next

The Clock Is Ticking for NJ Home Sellers: Act Now or Lose Out